Clinical Advances in Hepatitis C
2006-09-30 18:40:47This is part of one of the Medscape CME (Continuing Medical
Education) activities for health care workers. I am posting it here
for informational purposes only. The full article represents a
review of the viral hepatitis research that was submitted to the
57th Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Study of
Liver Diseases AASLD 2006 at Boston Massachusettes
The first half of this review is about Hepatitis B. I am skipping
that part and copying only the second part which deals with Hepatitis
C. If you would like to see the Hepatitis B part, let me know and
I'll post it
The source URL is: http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/548122
AASLD 2006 - Clinical Advances in Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C
Copyright © 2006 Medscape.
Hepatitis C
Pegylated Interferon
The mainstay of treatment for patients with hepatitis C has been
combination therapy with pegylated interferon and ribavirin, which
overall yields sustained response rates in approximately 50% of
patients treated. Few options are available for those patients who do
not respond to therapy, are unable to tolerate the side effects of
the interferon or ribavirin, or who relapse after discontinuation of
the medications.
More information has been accumulated in the past several years on
early predictors of nonresponse to therapy, whereby the lack of at
least a 2-log drop in the baseline viral load at week 12 was able to
identify those patients who had little chance of responding to
therapy (early viral response [EVR] rule). Clinicians, using this EVR
rule, were able to discontinue therapy in patients earlier, sparing
them significant side effects and associated costs. More recently, a
positive 4-week hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA level has been shown to
be predictive of higher rates of relapse post therapy, and the use of
this so-called rapid viral response (RVR) is now gaining clinical
applicability.
Shiffman and colleagues[14] reported results from the ACCELERATE
trial involving 1463 patients infected with HCV genotype 2 or 3 who
were treated with pegylated interferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin for
either 16* or 24 weeks. Currently, the standard of care is treatment
for 24 weeks for patients with HCV genotype 2 or 3. Results showed
that, overall, patients who received 24 weeks of therapy had a 90%
sustained virologic response (SVR) rate compared with 82% of patients
treated for 16 weeks. RVR and EVR rule were both highly predictive of
achieving SVR. Thus, RVR (HCV RNA undetectable at week 4 by
polymerase chain reaction [PCR]) and EVR are both highly predictive
of response to therapy in patients infected with HCV genotypes 2/3.
Decreasing duration of therapy to 16 weeks may be reasonable in
patients who achieve an RVR and have significant difficulty or side
effects with treatment.
Pearlman and colleagues[15] examined the effect of longer duration of
therapy using pegylated interferon alfa-2b plus weight-based
ribavirin dosing in patients infected with HCV genotype 1 who,
despite meeting the criteria for EVR (
RNA by PCR), were still HCV RNA PCR detectable until week 24 of
therapy. This group of "slower viral responders" was then treated for
either the usual 48 weeks or was extended to 72 weeks* of therapy.
Results showed a 39% SVR in the 72-week arm compared with 18% SVR in
the 48-week arm; treatment extension did not seem to result in an
increase in dose reductions or discontinuations. Thus, treatment of
hepatitis C has now evolved to a more individualized regimen, using
weight-based dosing of ribavirin and an adjusted duration of therapy,
depending on how rapidly patients respond to therapy. Longer duration
of therapy may improve sustained response rates in patients with
slower viral suppression.
Agents on the Horizon
Although great advances have been made with interferon and ribavirin-
based therapy, the most exciting new development on the horizon for
hepatitis C is the use of therapies that specifically target steps in
the cycle of hepatitis C replication as opposed to general
immunomodulators or antivirals. VX-950* is an oral HCV protease
inhibitor that has been shown to dramatically reduce HCV viral loads
to undetectable levels within 2-4 weeks in phase 2 trials.[16]
However, some viral variants emerged with this therapy. During this
year's AASLD meeting, Kieffer and colleagues[17] reported a detailed
analysis of these variants; data were presented on 16 patients
treated with VX-950 750 mg 3 times daily (n = 8) vs VX-950 750 mg 3
times daily plus pegylated interferon (n = 8) for 14 days. HCV RNA
was isolated after the treatment period for variants in the NS3
protease domain. Six of 8 patients treated with VX-950 monotherapy
had detectable mutations by the end of the 14 days, whereas 4 of 8 of
patients receiving combination pegylated interferon plus VX-950 also
had detectable virus (resistant or wild-type) at day 8. After the 14
days of therapy, 15 of 16 patients were treated with the standard
pegylated interferon plus ribavirin and all responded with complete
viral suppression by week 24. This suggests that although there may
be some viral resistance due to mutations with the use of the
protease inhibitor, viral suppression occurs successfully with the
addition of pegylated interferon and ribavirin.
In a late-breaking abstract presented by Roberts and colleagues,[18]
another target-specific HCV therapy, R1626*, a nucleoside analog oral
polymerase inhibitor, was administered in a phase 1b trial involving
47 treatment-naive patients infected with HCV genotype 1. Patients
were given R1626 at doses of 500, 1500, 3000, and 4500 mg twice daily
vs placebo for 14 days. The authors found that a dose-dependent viral
suppression occurred, with 5 of 9 patients in the 4500-mg treatment
arm having undetectable HCV RNA at day 15. Anemia occurred in some
patients; headache and gastrointestinal side effects were noted at
the highest dose.
New therapies targeting specific sites in the HCV replication cycle,
such as these protease or polymerase inhibitors, show early promise,
although viral resistance and side effects need further study in
larger, phase 2 trials.
Consensus Interferon
One of the most difficult clinical issues in liver transplantation is
the recurrence of hepatitis C after transplantation. Recurrence is
nearly universal, and studies have shown a more aggressive course of
HCV progression after transplant, with up to 20% of patients
developing cirrhosis by 5 years.[19] Treating the cirrhotic patient
before liver transplant may reduce the likelihood of recurrence;
however, treatment is limited by constitutional side effects, anemia,
thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia in this patient population.
Bacon and colleagues[20] presented their results from the DIRECT
(Daily-dose consensus Interferon and Ribavirin Efficacy of Combined
Therapy) trial using consensus interferon*(see note) plus ribavirin
in patients who previously failed to respond to pegylated interferon
+ ribavirin therapy. Of note, 29% of patients in this study were
cirrhotic by liver biopsy and more than 50% had bridging fibrosis.
Patients received consensus interferon at a dose of 9 micrograms
(mcg)/day or 15 mcg/day in combination with ribavirin vs no
treatment. Preliminary analysis at the end of treatment revealed a
29% end-of-treatment response in patients with greater than 80%
compliance with the 15-mcg/day consensus interferon + ribavirin
regimen. The lower dose of consensus interferon demonstrated lower
response rates (15%), and patients with cirrhosis had very low
response rates (< 8%). The most common side effects were neutropenia
and fatigue, with an overall 10% to 17% discontinuation rate.
Consensus interferon has demonstrated some moderate success in the
very difficult-to-treat group of patients who have nonresponse to
combination pegylated interferon plus ribavirin. Early treatment of
HCV infection offers more benefit, as the more advanced the
histologic disease, the lower the chance of success with any therapy
thus far.
Conclusion
Exciting new advances were presented in viral hepatitis at this
year's AASLD meeting. Our therapeutic armamentarium for hepatitis B
now includes several oral antiviral therapies, as well as
immunomodulatory agents. The major issues of viral resistance and
predictors of response and resistance are now under active study.
Hepatitis C is entering a new era of drug development with
specifically targeted therapies, although these strategies remain
very early in clinical development. Again, issues of safety and viral
resistance will come to the forefront in this arena. Individualized
therapy with the current standard of care, pegylated interferon plus
ribavirin, is key to optimizing patient outcomes.
*The US Food and Drug Administration has not approved this medication
for this use.