The Problem With Selling Organs
2007-02-28 17:52:01The Problem With Selling Organs
Yesterday morning Francis Delmonico, the Director of Medical Affairs for the
Transplant Society and an advisory to the WHO Transplant Committee, phoned me
because he had seen some of the articles I have been writing on the kidney
racket here in Chennai on this blog and in Wired News. He had included several
of my posts on the subject at a recent convention of nephrologists in Rio last
week and wanted to know more about the information I had gathered in my three
months researching the subject.
What strikes me most about the paying for organs issue is that the conversation
is still very narrowly defined. In the comments sections of other blogs I have
been accused of not truly understanding the situation and sensationalizing
medical procedures that ultimately aim to benefit both the donor (with cash) and
a patient who has to endure a painful existence on dialysis. Many people believe
that what is happening in Chennai is basically a well maintained free-market
that is ultimately tailored to the needs of patients. The assumption that many
people make is that the trade should be made legal.
But what I have seen in case after case on the streets of this city is that
everyone--doctors, brokers, news people, administrators, NGO workers and
dialysis patients--are exclusively focused on the plight of the patients paying
for an organ. They don't seem concerned in the least for people who supposedly
willingly sold their flesh to an underworld gang.
The truth on the streets of Chennai--and the world at large--is that the trade
in human organs is organized by a criminal underground that systematically
cheats and mishandles donor and patient interests. The people who sell their
kidneys get no good aftercare and often develop health problems as a result of
their surgery. Brokers and doctors them off out of the majority of the income
from the procedure and once they have left the hospital premises they are no
better off then when they signed up for the surgery. No one escapes poverty from
selling an organ. In Chennai, organ brokers pay between 30,000 and 60,000
($700-$1500) for a kidney. A patient will pay between 300,000 and 600,000 rupees
($7,000-$14,000) for the surgery. The rest of the money gets divvied up between
the broker, the doctor, official bribes, and hospital administrators).
One woman I met recently named Mallika (see photo) was paid on the low end for
her kidney. She made $700 and had to stay in a hospital for three weeks for
testing. The broker absconded with the cash that he made. Then, two weeks ago,
her 16 year old son was diagnosed with an advanced case of jaundice that caused
his kidneys to fail. At the moment he is at Stanley hospital getting dialysis
treatments but it is unlikely that she will be able to afford the treatment for
long. In a month he will die.
Mallika's case illustraites the inherent inequality of the system. She's poor
and a member of the city's organ farm. While she has been a health care provider
to a wealthy Indian patient, she has no access to care for her son. She can't
donate an organ to her son to save his life because the underworld has already
stolen the only commodity that she had access to.
According to the WHO for the last decade China has executed 5000 prisoners
annually in order to harvest organs. The organs they provide account for upwards
of 11,000 heart, liver and kidney transplants. Can you imagine being a prisoner
in China knowing that your only value to the government is to be a host for
organs? It is sort of like being a live fish in a tank at a sushi restaurant.
And while the Health Minister has vowed to end the practice (on behalf of the
upcoming Olympics) it most likely continues to today.
But what happens if China does cut off this steady supply of transplant organs?
There will still be a market for them and somehow wealthy sick people will
engage brokers and organized criminals to provide them. They will come from
people like Mallika.
In my opinion, in an article that will be published in Wired News this week or
next, I argue that the only way to solve the problem is to drive the price of
organs down by increasing the supply of cadaver organs. And the only way to do
that is to harvest organs from every possible brain dead organ donor without
regard to consent. The technology is in place to make it possible to harvest
organs from you, me and anyone else who gets killed in an auto accident. Organs
can be flown around the world in less than 24 hours and transplants made
available to anyone at a fraction of the live-donor costs. But the sad state of
the present is that live-donor transplants are logistically easier to manage.
The donor can find their own way to the hospital and the negotiations only
involve one person (rather than a whole family for a brain-dead organ).
Inevitably, efforts to regulate the organ market just don't work. In places like
Iran and the Phillipines where selling organs is basically legal you find that
the state has taken over the role of brokers and rarely looks out for the
welfare of patients. And even if one country regulates the trade in transparent
way, it will most likely be more expensive than unregulated--illegal
markets--and patients will seek shady transplants abroad.
So when this article appears in a couple days on Wired News, I expect that
dozens of people will levy the charge at me that I just don't understand the
free market. That I'm sensationalizing the stories of donors and not adequately
looking at the levels of despair of a person on dialysis. To this, I can only
think about the countless conversations I have had with people who have given
their organs, been cheated, and are worse off than they were before.
In the words of Nancy Schper-Hughes, the founder of Organs Watch, "Why should
the poor have to pay the body tax?"
click here to see other photos from my thee month investigation.
http://www.scottcarneyonline.com/blog/2007/05/problem-with-selling-organs.html