Organ-transplant black market thrives in India
2008-05-31 14:50:52Organ-transplant black market thrives in India
Anuj Chopra, Chronicle Foreign Service
Saturday, February 9, 2008
Tears well up in P. Guna's eyes as he stares at a long scar running down his
side. A year ago, he attempted to stave off mounting debt by swapping one of his
healthy kidneys for quick cash.
"Humans don't need two kidneys, I was made to believe," he said. "I can sell my
extra kidney and become rich, I thought."
At the time, an organ trader promised Guna, 38, a motorized-rickshaw driver with
a fourth-grade education, $2,500 for the kidney, of which he eventually received
only half. Since then, he has experienced excruciating pain in his hip that has
kept him from working full time and pushed him deeper in debt.
In recent years, many Indian cities - like Chennai in southern India - have
become hubs of a murky business in kidney transplants, despite a 1994 nationwide
ban on human organ sales (the Transplant of Human Organ Act states only
relatives of patients can donate kidneys).
An influx of patients, mainly foreigners, seeking the transplants, has made the
illicit market a lucrative business. Some analysts say the business thrives for
the same reasons that have made India a top destination for medical tourism: low
cost and qualified doctors. In fact, medical tourism is expected to reach $2.2
billion by 2012, according to government estimates.
Not surprisingly, an organized group of organ traders in cahoots with
unscrupulous doctors is constantly on the prowl for donors like Guna.
In Gurgaon, a posh New Delhi suburb, police last month busted an illegal organ
racket, which included doctors, nurses, pathology clinics and hospitals. In the
past 14 years, the participants allegedly removed kidneys from about 500 day
laborers, the majority of them abducted or conned, before selling the organs to
wealthy clients.
Police say the doctor believed to be the mastermind behind the operation, Amit
Kumar, searched for donors by cruising in luxury cars outfitted with medical
testing machines, and kept sophisticated surgical equipment in a residential
apartment. In his office, police found letters and e-mail messages from 48
people from nine countries inquiring about transplants.
On Thursday, police arrested Kumar in Chitwan, a Nepalese jungle resort. Local
news reports said he was identified by a hotel employee who recognized him from
Indian television broadcasts seen in Nepal. "I have not duped anybody," Kumar
later told reporters in Kathmandu, according to the Associated Press.
Nepalese authorities say they won't extradite Kumar until they finish an
investigation on whether he violated currency laws by not declaring $230,000 in
cash and a check for $24,000 that he was carrying when arrested. He is scheduled
to appear in a Nepalese court Sunday.
In another high-profile arrest, a renowned Chennai surgeon, Palani Ravichandran,
was arrested in October in Mumbai for involvement in a kidney racket. He
admitted to arranging organ transplants for wealthy foreigners - mainly from
Persian Gulf states and Malaysia, whom he charged up to $25,000. Mumbai police
say Ravichandran had performed between 40 and 100 illegal transplants since
2002.
Police say kidney donors can earn between $1,250 and $2,500, while recipients
pay as much as $25,000, according to ActionAid India, an anti-poverty
organization that has worked with kidney trade victims in the southern state of
Tamil Nadu.
The same procedure can cost as much as $70,000 in China and $85,000 in the
United States.
"These middlemen act more like cut-and-grab men whose only interest is to hack
out the organ," said Annie Thomas, a field co-coordinator for ActionAid in
Chennai, formerly known as Madras. "This is a reprehensible abuse of the poor,
and this practice needs to be curbed."
Thomas says many middlemen typically masquerade the donors as relatives to
circumvent the law while many foreigners in need of a kidney arrive on tourist
visas rather than the required medical visas; some resort to false documents.
In Korkkupet, a teeming slum, the trade is prevalent, local activists say.
Although they offer no specific estimates, the activists say it's difficult to
find a family that doesn't have a relative who has sold a kidney.
Two years ago, A. Muttama, 39, a fisherwoman, received just $1,250 for a kidney
after being promised $3,750 from a man known only as Kurrupiah. Residents say he
is a Korkkupet resident who goes from house to house searching for donors.
"He told me, 'Follow my example. I was a very poor man. Now, look at me. I
became rich after I sold my kidney,' " Muttama recalled.
Kurrupiah's three-story mansion is reached through a labyrinth of garbage-choked
lanes, which meander through an endless sprawl of dilapidated shacks.
His wife, who, residents allege, also sold a kidney to her middleman husband,
stood at the entrance, festooned with gold bangles, gold earrings and a
glittering necklace.
A bevy of burly guards stood by. Kurrupiah, a middle-aged man, denied that he
had anything to do with the kidney trade, and he refused to explain his source
of income.
Chennai physicians say a scarcity of organ donors is the main factor behind the
illicit trade.
Sunil Shroff, a well-known renal transplant surgeon, says the best practice to
prevent the thriving commerce in living donors would use donors who are declared
brain dead. "If the government is keen on ending the kidney trade, it should
encourage cadaver-based transplants in a big way," he said.
But some doctors say even a campaign to use deceased-donor organs would only
reduce the trade in living donors, and benefit just those who can afford the
expensive operation. Patients receiving cadaver-harvested organs have to be on
immunosuppressant drugs for life, which cost hundreds of dollars monthly,
according to R. Ravichandran, the director of the Madras Institute of
Nephrology.
"What is needed is a regulated system for legal live related organ donation," he
said, which protects the interests of both donors and recipients.
"The choice before us in not between buying or not buying organs. This is
happening regardless of the law. The choice is whether transplant operations and
the sale of organs will be regulated or not."
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/02/09/MN23UPQ0K.DTL